The Real Problem Isn’t Legal
Having worked inside countless companies, I’ve seen the same situation play out over and over again:
Procurement teams often think their legal departments are sitting around eating chocolate-covered bon bons instead of reviewing urgent contracts.
Let’s cut to the chase: the problem is not the legal department.
The problem is procurement. Let me explain.
Legal Is Underfunded – But That’s Just One Piece
Legal departments are considered overhead. That means they’re never sufficiently funded, and that under-resourcing impacts all stakeholders.
But that’s only part of the problem—and one we can work around if we handle other things right.
Let’s keep going.
Throwing Red-Hot Contracts Over the Fence
Procurement often tosses urgent, high-stakes contracts over the fence to legal, expecting swift approval.
You might ask:
“What else are we supposed to do?”
Here’s what you need to understand: Contracts are risk-shifting vehicles.
And there are two major types of risk:
Legal Risk
Covers potential financial loss, litigation exposure, public relations issues, etc.Legal’s focus areas include:
Limitation of liability
Damages
Indemnification
Insurance
Dispute resolution
Intellectual property
➤ And guess what? These rarely go wrong. Most procurement professionals go an entire career never needing these clauses.
So why negotiate them at all?
Because they’re like seatbelts—you use them 500,000 times in case something happens once.
They are essential.Commercial Risk
These relate to supplier performance:What the supplier must deliver
Payment tied to performance
Remedies for underperformance
➤ And these? They go wrong all the time.
Legal Doesn’t Cover Commercial Risk – That’s Your Job
Here’s the kicker: Legal has almost no training in supplier performance clauses.
And that’s not their fault. It’s not their job.
It’s yours. Entirely.
📌 Read this twice:
The #1 mistake procurement professionals make is assuming that when legal approves a contract, it means it’s a good deal for the business.
Wrong.
Legal reviews the legal terms. But the commercial terms—the ones that go wrong most often—are your responsibility.
And that’s why procurement ends up with:
Contracts that mitigate risks that never happen
And completely miss the risks that always happen
Saving T&Cs for Last = A Recipe for Disaster
Now for the next mistake:
Procurement often saves the contract language for last.
We tell suppliers:
"Let’s finalize the price/warranty/lead time first. We’ll get to T&Cs later."
But here’s what the supplier hears:
"Once I win the business, I can redline the entire contract with no pushback."
📌 Read this twice:
Contract terms saved for last will lead to:
Endless headaches
Three times more legal delays
A flood of redlines
Lost leverage
Why does the supplier redline more when the contract is saved for last?
Because they can.
You gave them the business before you finalized the risk terms. You incentivized it.
Procurement Needs Legal Fluency and an SLA
Final mistake:
Procurement is often not legally savvy and lacks a Service Level Agreement (SLA) with the legal department.
That needs to change.
Your fluency in contract law should be like a mechanic’s fluency with a wrench—intuitive and practiced.
Once you’ve built this capability:
You can negotiate many clauses without needing legal
You can establish a SLA with legal, defining responsibilities and workflows
Then, when the contract finally reaches legal:
It will have fewer redlines
Many issues will already be resolved
The supplier won’t yet feel they’ve secured the business, because terms were discussed first, not last
The commercial terms will be solid, and owned by procurement
Move the Profession Forward
If you want to truly speed up negotiations and build high-performing contracts, you need to:
Stop blaming legal
Own the commercial terms
Get fluent in contract law
Negotiate terms early, not last
Build a real SLA with legal
Now Go Off and Do Something Wonderful
Be your best!
– Omid G.
“THE Godfather of Negotiation Planning” – Intel Corp